Isn't it about time that all those who put forward the Big Bang theory would find intelligent, rational and plausible arguments founded on facts rather than the constant theorising that goes on?
The recent BBC programme presented by Brian Cox only reinforces the hogwash and fluffy language that is used to push this diatribe upon the public, the vast majority of whom, have no idea about the origins of the Universe.
The Big Bang people flaunt this theory, yet make no credible arguments about its veracity.
How can they after all posit any facts about what may or may not have occurred 1, 2, 5 or 10 billion years ago. After all, we have people arguing that dinosaurs were wiped out 65 million years ago, but who plucked that figure out of thin air? Could it have been 80 million or 40 million? Who knows?
There is far too much theorising by people who have no inner convictions, no core beliefs that would give a solid and intelligent argument.
And would anyone please, please give me one solid fact that supports the Big Bang, when they, the very proponents can't agree on where the actual matter for the Big Bang originated from. There must have been matter, dust, whatever for a big bang argument, but they never countenance that.
As for the 'order out of chaos' argument, then read my previous post of today on Professor Cox's wooly-thinking TV programme. A totally fatuous argument if ever there was on.
The Big Bang is a Big Flop.
Prove otherwise.
No comments:
Post a Comment